Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

[jcupitt gmail com]

On 29 January 2016 at 19:07, Adam Bavier <adam bavier gmail com> wrote:
> numbers in that benchmark, I propose adding a asterisk * by each gegl number
> would help the reader understand that something is different with this
> library.  Then add the corresponding asterisk down by the statement, "GEGL
> is not really designed for batch-style processing -- it targets interactive
> applications, like paint programs."  Since gegl is the only interactive

That's a good idea, thank you. I've updated the page with numbered
notes by some results to make the qualifications easier to find.

John