Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

[Sven Claussner <scl gplus gmail com>]

Hi Daniel,

thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree with you in many points.

On  29.1.2016 at 5:37 PM Daniel Rogers wrote:
>   * Anyone can do dynamic compilation nowadays with llvm.  Imagine
>     taking the gegl dynamic tree, and compiling it into a single LLVM
>     dynamically compiled function.

What exactly do you mean? How is this supposed to work and where is the
performance advantage if done at runtime?

Greetings

Sven