Re: [Gegl-developer] Making GEGL and Babl releases "soon"

["Joao S. O. Bueno" <gwidion mpc com br>]

Daniel - there is that bug in gobject about GParamSpecs segfaulting I
mentioned in the gimp-devel thread - I  don know if it is listed in
bugzilla - but if you are talking about a release "right now", I think
it'd be worth taking a look at.

Steps to reproduce:
$ python
Python 2.7.3 (default, Jul 24 2012, 11:41:40)
[GCC 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2)] on linux2
> > > from gi.repository import Gegl
> > > Gegl.init([])[]
> > > params = Gegl.operation_list_properties("gegl:png-load")

(python:21947): GEGL-gegl-operations.c-WARNING **: Adding
GeglChantinvert-linear_c shadows GeglChantinvert_c for operation
gegl:invert
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gi/types.py:43: Warning:
g_object_get_qdata: assertion 'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
  return info.invoke(*args, **kwargs)
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/gi/types.py:43: Warning:
g_object_ref_sink: assertion 'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
  return info.invoke(*args, **kwargs)

** (python:21947): CRITICAL **: pygobject_register_wrapper: assertion
'PyObject_TypeCheck(self, &PyGObject_Type)' failed
> > > dir(params[0])
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$


  js
 -><-

On 29 November 2013 11:21, Daniel Sabo <danielsabo gmail com> wrote:
> Gimp 2.8 still has "GEGL Operation" under the Tools menu, which
> apparently some people are using because we get bug reports about it
> crashing. I don't see the time it would take to backport those fixes
> to the 0.2 branch as worthwhile; there aren't any significant changes
> required for Gimp to use 0.3 but the fixes in GEGL are intertwined
> with other changes that make backporting impractical.
> _______________________________________________
> gegl-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gegl-developer-list gnome org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list