Re: [Geary] conversation list sorting criteria



I would vote against a preference or UI element for this.  I could live with either sorting order, but I think the difference is minor enough that a preference is not worth it.

adam

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Niels De Graef <nielsdegraef gmail com> wrote:
Hi all,

To me, the best option would be to have a preference or a UI element at the top of the conversation list that lets the user choose which kind of sorting to take.

That aside, I think that your suggestion does indeed seem more intuitive than the current situation.

Kind regards, Niels De Graef


Op di, 11 okt 2016 om 2:49 , schreef Federico Bruni <fede inventati org>:
As far as I understand, the conversation list is sorted by _receiving_ date/time. This means that if I reply to an old conversation, this conversation will stay in the bottom of the list until someone replies to my message. I'm used to a different behaviour, as in Gmail, where sent messages are taken into account when sorting conversations. I like this approach, because I want recent conversations to stay on top and IMO sent messages count as much as received messages. What's your feeling about it? _______________________________________________ geary-list mailing list geary-list gnome org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/geary-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]