Hi Robert, I'm trying to keep the amount of accounts I open on the internet as low as possible, so I'll respond here once more. Verifying signatures is a nice thing, sure. For me personally, it's about being able to encrypt messages, though (instead of sending them through the internet as postcards everybody who wants to can take a look at). In what way that would be implemented (inline PGP, PGP/MIME, S/MIME, whatever) I don't really care as long as it "just works" (including HTML and attachments, as I understand that these seem to be distinct topics). I hope that's what you wanted to know about and look forward to getting rid of old clumsy Thunderbird+Enigmail one day! Best regards, Jonathan Am 30.01.2015 um 21:17 schrieb Robert Schroll:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:37 PM, J. R. Schmid <jrs weitnahbei de> wrote:I'm refreshing a thread where Gilbert Röhrbein asked in August of 2012 if there was going to be PGP support for GearyI'm curious what you (as in everyone, not Jonathan specifically) means when asking for PGP support. There's signing messages, verifying signatures, encrypting messages, and decrypting messages. There's inline PGP, PGP/MIME, S/MIME (okay, not exactly PGP, but still), and probably other standards I haven't heard about. Which of these can you not live without, and which would just be icing on the cake? "PGP support" is a huge problem, but "verifying inline PGP signatures" is a bit more tractable. Just so everyone knows, there is a bug tracking PGP support: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=713403. You might do better to respond there, so whoever decides to attack this problem will see it. Robert
-- Privacy is not a crime. No perceived freedom of speech means no democracy. http://www.german-privacy-fund.de/e-mails-verschlusseln-leicht-gemacht/
Attachment:
0x53847E3F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature