Re: [Geary] GPG/OpenPGP support

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:37 PM, J. R. Schmid <jrs weitnahbei de> wrote:
I'm refreshing a thread where Gilbert Röhrbein asked in August of 2012
if there was going to be PGP support for Geary

I'm curious what you (as in everyone, not Jonathan specifically) means when asking for PGP support. There's signing messages, verifying signatures, encrypting messages, and decrypting messages. There's inline PGP, PGP/MIME, S/MIME (okay, not exactly PGP, but still), and probably other standards I haven't heard about. Which of these can you not live without, and which would just be icing on the cake? "PGP support" is a huge problem, but "verifying inline PGP signatures" is a bit more tractable.

Just so everyone knows, there is a bug tracking PGP support: You might do better to respond there, so whoever decides to attack this problem will see it.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]