Re: [gdome]XSLT status

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:47:00PM -0500, T.J. Mather wrote:
> I agree that this should be a separate library.
> 
> Since libxslt operates on document nodes, we should only have to go from 
> Gdome document nodes to libxml2 document nodes and back.  This should 
> greatly simplify things.

  yes.

> I think that libxslt creates a new document from scratch, so 
> memory management shouldn't be an big issue.

  yes, except for what's called result value tree. But they are not
visible at the transformation level, only if you start touching
variables content etc...

> Anyway, I'll try to put something together by next week.

  I will be toying with this kind of things at the python binding
level too.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/