Re: remote configuration sources



Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> "Kenneth Lierman Jr." <kliermanm bigfoot com> writes:
> > So, how would you see this proceeding?
> 
> Well, step 1 is clearly "someone appears with tons of time to hack on
> it, and some pretty sharp coding skills."
> 
> I hadn't thought about it too much beyond that. ;-)
> 

well, no promises, but i'm certainly interrested enough to look into it
some more.... if i come back with more questions, info, etc, should i take
it off the gconf maillist, or does this seem apropriate for now?

Ken




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]