Re: Evolution with gnome2.8



Oh my goodness. Thanks a million.

Works great now :)

See ya,
Eugene

On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 16:56 +0200, guenther wrote:
> > > Has anyone else had this problem?
> > 
> > Sounds strangely familiar... :/
> > 
> > Please see, if it might be this bug. Feel free to comment it, at least
> > an AOL-style "me too" to raise awareness.
> > 
> >   http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=65996
> > 
> > I only tested this with Garnome 2.6.2 so far, but it seems to be an
> > Evolution issue anyway.
> 
> This issue seems to be resolved. Yay. :)
> 
> If I remember the discussion on IRC correctly this issue is related to
> NPTL, LD_ASSUME_KERNEL and AMD processors.
> 
> The quick solution for AMD 32bit processors:
> 
> * Remove the line LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 from the session file. Log out
>   and kill all e-d-s and b-a-s processes from a console. Log in again.
>   Start Evolution and have lots of fun... :)
> 
> * Alternatively, just make sure b-a-s and e-d-s are not called with
>   LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set.
> 
> AMD 64bit processors might need a patch. That patch works for AMD 32bit
> processors with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 still set.
> 
>   http://toshok.org/libdb-pthread-patch.diff
> 
> Bugzilla references:
>   http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=65996
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132840
> 
> ...guenther
> 
> 
> -- 
> char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]