Re: missing index.sgml

[sams marketing-designs com]

Mario Vukelic (mario vukelic dantian org) wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 02:08, sams marketing-designs com wrote:
> 
> > yep, after that the gtkdoc-mkdb command started looking in some of the
> > xsl stylesheets for something (not sure what exactly) and since they are
> > not installed (correctly?) 
> 
> It's just that AFAICT everything is there correctly. Unless Debian
> woody's packages are broken in some way, or versions too old
> 
> 
> mario sonic: ~ $ dpkg -l *docbook*
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> |
> Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name                         Version                     
> Description
> +++-============================-============================-==========
> ii  docbook                      4.1.99really4.2.cr1-2        SGML DTD
> for authors of technical documentation
> un  docbook-doc                  <none>                       (no
> description available)
> ii  docbook-dsssl                1.76-1                       Modular
> DocBook DSSSL stylesheets, for print and HTML
> un  docbook-dsssl-doc            <none>                       (no
> description available)
> un  docbook-stylesheets          <none>                       (no
> description available)
> ii  docbook-utils                0.6.13-2                     Convert
> Docbook files to other formats (HTML, RTF, PS, man, PDF)
> ii  docbook-xml                  4.1.99really4.2.cr1-2        XML DTD
> for DocBook, also known as DocBk XML
> ii  docbook-xsl                  1.50.0-2                    
> Stylesheets for processing DocBook XML files to HTML and FO.
> un  docbook-xsl-stylesheets      <none>                       (no
> description available)
remember I told you it was something like the xsl stylesheets not being
installed?  I would guess that docbook-xsl-stylesheets installs the xsl
stylesheets for docbook.  I am not a debian guy though, so I could be
wrong.  Either way, can you post the error you are getting so that I can
show everyone exactly what I mean when I say "make is failing, but not
telling you so loudly enough".
> un  docbook2man                  <none>                       (no
> description available)
> un  docbook2texi                 <none>                       (no
> description available)
> un  docbook2x-doc                <none>                       (no
> description available)

-- 
Samuel Stringham                   /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Computer Consultant                \ /    Respect for open standards
sams marketing-designs com          X     No HTML/RTF in email
                                   / \    No M$ Word docs in email