Re: 0.14.1 vs gcc-3.2
- From: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett iolinc net>
- To: "Idan Gazit" <id panix com>, <garnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: 0.14.1 vs gcc-3.2
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 21:13:20 -0400
On Friday 06 September 2002 10:45, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Friday 06 September 2002 04:34, Idan Gazit wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Gene,
>>
>>I'm considering a 3.2 build and would be interested in your list
>> of "snags" compiling garnome.
>>
>>Are your troubles exclusively KDE? I won't be building KDE, but
>> if the gnome build process becomes laborious I may just pass on
>> using 3.2.
>>
>>By and large, do you recommend using gcc-3.2 as your compiler? I
>> am busy compiling a clean linux box and I need to decide which
>> compiler I will use as my basis. At the behest of some other
>> kind soul on the list, I am considering either 2.95.3 or 3.2 but
>> not together, because of the ABI changes to C++ compiles; it
>> sounds like a real mess later on when I forget which libraries
>> were compiled with what. I guess either programs will stop
>> compiling or I'll start getting strange segfaults all over the
>> place, and neither sounds really appealing.
>>
>>Thanks in advance!
>>
>>Idan
>
>My guess is that if it was all installed in the right places,
> which I don't think I have yet, it would work just fine. Its
> built everything I threw at it so except kde-3.0.3 via garnome,
> and mosfet-liquid, both heavily c++ stuff that needs the 3.2
> versions of the STL headers that aren't located in /usr/include
> here now. But based on what I've seen so far, I think I'll do a
> make clean in the build directory, and modify the makefile to go
> ahead and have it install itself in /usr. That would make many
> of my problems go away I'm sure.
Update, they didn't. Got worse in fact. I cleaned out the build
dir for gcc3.2, reran the configure using all the defaults, make'd
a bootstrap, check and install. No difference, so I went after
qt-3.0.5, but gave it a bunch of options since it defaults to a lot
of them off. Built it, no errors important enough to abort the
build.
Now I can't even startx, and in garnome-0.14.1/meta/kde I get this
for a make:
----------------
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/garnome-0.14.1/kde/arts'
[fetch] complete. Finished rules: pre-everything download
pre-fetch download/arts-1.0.3.tar.bz2 post-fetch
[checksum] complete. Finished rules: fetch cookies
pre-checksum cookies/checksum-arts-1.0.3.tar.bz2 post-checksum
[extract] complete. Finished rules: checksum work cookies
pre-extract cookies/extract-arts-1.0.3.tar.bz2 post-extract
[patch] complete. Finished rules: extract work/arts-1.0.3
pre-patch post-patch
==> Building kde/qt-copy as a dependency
==> Building gnome/glib as a dependency
==> Running configure in work/arts-1.0.3
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c
checking for -p flag to install... yes
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c -p
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
make[4]: *** [configure-work/arts-1.0.3/configure] Error 77
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/garnome-0.14.1/kde/arts'
make[3]: *** [dep-../../kde/arts] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/garnome-0.14.1/kde/kdelibs'
make[2]: *** [dep-../../kde/kdelibs] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/garnome-0.14.1/kde/kdebase'
make[1]: *** [dep-../../kde/kdebase] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/garnome-0.14.1/kde/kdeadmin'
make: *** [dep-../../kde/kdeadmin] Error 2
---------------------------
Reverting back to qt-3.0.4 as /usr/loca/lqt and startx works,
running it now.
Ideas?
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III 500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP 1400mhz 512M
99.14% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]