RE: 0.14.1 vs gcc-3.2

["Idan Gazit" <id panix com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gene,

I'm considering a 3.2 build and would be interested in your list of
"snags" compiling garnome.

Are your troubles exclusively KDE? I won't be building KDE, but if
the gnome build process becomes laborious I may just pass on using
3.2.

By and large, do you recommend using gcc-3.2 as your compiler? I am
busy compiling a clean linux box and I need to decide which compiler
I will use as my basis. At the behest of some other kind soul on the
list, I am considering either 2.95.3 or 3.2 but not together, because
of the ABI changes to C++ compiles; it sounds like a real mess later
on when I forget which libraries were compiled with what. I guess
either programs will stop compiling or I'll start getting strange
segfaults all over the place, and neither sounds really appealing.

Thanks in advance!

Idan

- --
id at panix dot com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - WinPT 0.5.12
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9eGiZIlf5wmDAMNIRAjxEAKDlMvVTzxTW8sfjxX70aI7OAMCtswCffrWU
oY3y49JweUTkl9g/sh0t9Co=
=60sB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----