Re: [gamin] New inotify backend checked in

[John McCutchan <ttb tentacle dhs org>]

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 11:32 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:04:42AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > Yes, if we decide to support a busy poll fallback when using inotify, it
> > > would be MUCH cheaper than the dnotify was. But I'm still not convinced
> > > that it is needed.
> > 
> >    I gave rationale for it, point is that if it isn't needed it won't
> > be used, but implementation is ultra cheap especially on inotify. The problem
> > is that within 3 months you won't get any feedback about those use cases.
> 
>   That said that should not block us from pushing a release to get feedback.
> The main problem anyway will be to have an inotify recent kernel. Fedora
> doesn't, Mandrake still use the old kernel API, so this will have limited
> scope. We can still discuss the poll/no poll added support and mechanisms
> independantly.
>   I will try to make a release over the week-end

Thanks, Excellent.

-- 
John McCutchan <ttb tentacle dhs org>