Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum


On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Allan Day <aday gnome org> wrote:
because Ben's behaviour had become so unacceptable (despite multiple
warnings regarding basic behaviour) that it was difficult to get
anything done within the wider working group context.

And on Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:45 AM, he added:
It should be noted that the board group includes every active member
of the code of conduct working group, with the exception of Ben. So
"without including the rest of the WG" translates to "without
including Ben".

The WG is a group working on a document that invites people involved
in a conflict to seek assistance from a third party. Yet it seems
that, when a conflict arised, they didn’t call for external
arbitration, and even went as far as issuing warnings to one of the
parties involved on their own. I find this highly disturbing.

He then concludes:
As already stated, this was a direct response to
repeated unacceptable behaviour on Ben's part.

Whether that was the appropriate behaviour is still an open question though.


Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]