Re: Mission Statement
- From: Mathieu Duponchelle <mduponchelle1 gmail com>
- To: Máirín Duffy <duffy fedoraproject org>
- Cc: GNOME Foundation <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Mission Statement
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 06:06:30 +0200
Women do represent a pretty significant portion of the general public,
no? I think for men by men probably doesn't meet the "general public"
qualifier there.
"Standalone OPW" is different from "from men by men", I'm afraid I don't understand your argument here?
A problem I see in the current debate is that we all argue quite subjectively, and have no metrics for quantifying OPW's potential positive impact on the GNOME project. We do on the other had have financial and operational metrics that suggest that OPW in recent times had had a less positive impact.
To me, the problem looks indeed clear, and can be stated that way:
If outreach is considered to be an end goal of the GNOME project, then it should be included in the mission statement.
If on the other hand we consider it to only be a tool to serve GNOME's mission, we should quantify together as best as we can its impact on the project, and if it is found to be detrimental, stop managing it ourselves. People can then step up to the challenge of creating a foundation with outreach as a mission statement.
I personally think the GNOME foundation's main role should
be to ensure its current mission statement, and outreach should only be a
tool, not the end goal.
With respects to metrics, I am sure we can find ways to quantify engagement in terms of commit percentages per gender in time for example (I know the problem here lies in finding out the gender for a given commit author, just an idea).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]