Re: Extending the call for candidates (was Re: Withdrawal of board of idrectors candidacy)



Seems like a valid point.

p.s. not saying the current candidates are not valid or worthy :)
p.s.s. a valid point that this year we should continue as is. It isn't fair to the ones that have submitted their candidacy on time.

-- 
Jared Jennings

On Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:

It is not a good thing when there are so few candidates
that nearly all have to be elected. With just 8 candidates
and a 7-member board, we are only voting about which single
one of these candidate not to put on the board. That is getting
pretty close to no choice at all. What would we do if there were
only 7 candidates? If there were only 6?

I propose changing the election rules for future elections so that if
the number of candidates is less than 7/4 the size of the board, there
will be another request for candidates, giving 5 days for people to
step forward.

If that squeezes the subsequent step, then expand it
by moving all the previous dates 5 days earlier.


--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call

_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]