Re: GNOME Quarterly Reports
- From: Juanjo Marín <juanjomarin96 yahoo es>
- To: "foundation-list gnome org" <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME Quarterly Reports
- Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:53:25 +0000 (GMT)
----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
> Para: foundation-list gnome org
> CC:
> Enviado: Lunes 31 de diciembre de 2012 17:24
> Asunto: Re: GNOME Quarterly Reports
>
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 12:45 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Perhaps it means our current way
>> of doing them is not successful, and we need to try something else.
>
> So in case anybody wants to assemble what's going on and present it in a
> better way, I am happy to help out.
>
> Currently I don't plan to send out further calls for quarterly reports
> (as it would be the case again tomorrow).
>
there is a mismatching between
Hi,
I personally think that the major drawback is that there is a mismatch between the quarterly reports and our release scheme. IMHO, it would be easier if we adapt our reports to the our release scheduler. One of the inmediate advantages of this can be that can be used for writing the release notes more accurately in time. I think a quarterly reports can be thought as a sort of logs of the work developed by the teams in every release. And I think they should be updated everytime a new milestone has been reached.
Just my two cents,
-- Juanjo Marin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]