On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 23:53 +0000, Juanjo Marín wrote: > I personally think that the major drawback is that there is a mismatch > between the quarterly reports and our release scheme. Rather than being a PR exercise, the quarterly report could be recast as, alternately, a formal progress report ~2 months before release (highlighting areas of urgent concern), and then a review ~1 month after (observing what worked and what didn't in well enough time to make adjustments next cycle). We have a lot of structure in our release process, but defined occasions to discuss progress might be a good addition. AfC Sydney
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part