Re: Candidacy: Rodrigo Moya

[Allan Day <allanpday gmail com>]

On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 14:06 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 12:50 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:26 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 10:45 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > > Also, based on recent discussions, I would like to help define the
> > > > > message we give to 3rd parties about what GNOME is, so there is no
> > > > > confusion as to what those 3rd parties should expect from GNOME.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you think GNOME means GNOME shell or not?
> > > 
> > > yes, I do
> > 
> > Could you both elaborate, please?
> > 
> > Rodrigo: can you explain how the GNOME project will benefit? Why is your
> > approach better than the alternatives?
> > 
> well, not sure my approach is better, I'm sure other candidates will
> have great ideas also, just that there seems to be a lot of discussions
> about what GNOME OS is/is not or should/should not be. So I'd like to
> contribute in making it clear what the whole GNOME project is for 3rd
> parties.
> 
> As my personal opinion, I agree completely on the GNOME OS idea,
> although we should really not forget other OSes (Solaris, *BSD, etc)
> that use GNOME or other systems (Meego, etc) that are interested in just
> using our platform. So, I will try to keep the focus on the GNOME OS
> idea (with GNOME Shell, to answer again Olav's question) but making sure
> this doesn't break our relationship with those other systems.
> 
> Does this answer your question?

Yes thanks! :)

Allan

-- 
Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org