Re: foundation-list Digest, Vol 68, Issue 13
- From: Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron Sun COM>
- To: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: foundation-list Digest, Vol 68, Issue 13
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:50 -0600
If there is enough people to do a vote, that's great.
My vote: -1
I do not think that people should be discouraged from suggesting rules
for the GNOME community, and a reaction like leaving the GNU community
because Richard made a suggestion could be interpreted that way, I
think. We can always say "no".
Richard Stallman said:
There are many ways to implement such a rule, of which "block the whole
blog" is about the toughest one we might consider. I'd suggest rather
to try a mild approach; I'm sure that can do the job.
Richard's suggestion that a "mild approach" may be appropriate does not
seem over-the-top to me. Perhaps a "mild approach" could be something
simple like a disclaimer on planet that highlights that "some
information on planet may advertise non-free software, and we want to
make clear that GNOME does not endorse non-free software and instead
encourages people to consider free alternatives." might be a reasonably
mild and acceptable solution? I would prefer to see such a disclaimer,
actually.
Perhaps we should also make the disclaimer say something about hunting.
Brian
Such a vote, whatever the outcome, would have little effect on the GNOME
project.
The debate during the vote could cause a lot of harm & discord for the
GNOME community.
An outcome whereby GNOME is no longer a GNU project could cause a lot of
harm to the free software and open source movements in general - there
would be massive negative publicity.
Since there is very little up-side and substantial down-side, both real
and in terms of image (which is an important consideration, I think), I
do not think that we should vote on this issue.
Don't we have more concrete issues to address?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]