Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

[Julien Puydt <jpuydt gnome org>]

Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
> On 12/07/2009 01:32 PM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > Le 27/11/2009 10:53, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:50 -0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > > > Alternative proposal: lets deal with the problem at hand and get our
> > > > story straight about what is planet.gnome.org, what can be posted
> > > > there (i.e. no porn and vulgar language etc.) and how we can help
> > > > to enforce a reasonably exact policy on an exact resource which
> > > > is planet.gnome.org.
> > >
> > > planet.gnome.org is hard to moderate. Editors can only remove an entire
> > > blog. It would be easier if the software allowed the existing editors to
> > > remove a single blog post.
> >
> > Let's be honest too : there are a bunch of people which used to be
> > active GNOME members, who changed their focus to other projects and are
> > still in Planet GNOME for no reason. Maybe PGO editors should start
> > cleaning "the old cruft" (no offense intended)..
>
> But I find it interesting to know, say, what Miguel is up to these days.
> I don't think it's just me...

What about a "Planet Old Gnome Farts" ? People would get there from PGO 
one year after their last active contribution.

JP

PS: this idea is a little rough and may need some patching... at least 
the name, please!