Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation
- From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms 1407 org>
- To: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:38:11 +0000
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:16:48AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="jamie">
>
> > I can see MS spinning this to their advantage and I believe playing safe
> > here would be better for us in the short term
>
> Thing is, Microsoft haven't spun it to their advantage. They've mentioned
> that Gnumeric is implementing OOXML, but that actually works against them
> (due to the complexity of the spec and the completeness of the impl).
That's only true for people who understand how writing software works.
To a policy maker, writing software is something little gnomes do when he
asks IT department for some feature. If it isn't a full implementation,
then for him it's okay because we all know software isn't bug-free.
They *are* spinning it to their advantage. Give them a hand, they'll
rip your arm off. They're not people, they are an entity whose moral duty
is to increase shareholder revenue to a maximum.
That they send nice guys to shows and talks is only a means to let you
off-guard.
> They
> haven't spun our membership of TC45-M to their advantage, and they won't,
> because we're not their friends, and won't react kindly if they do. :-)
Not "chalengable" *written forms*...
Rui
--
All Hail Discordia!
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 37th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]