On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 23:29 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > Sometimes what is good for a GNOME-using company is also good for the > free software community. Sometimes it isn't. When it isn't, there's > a conflict of interest. > > This isn't heavy-handed and ugly, but it is a possible conflict of > interest. I think it would be a good idea to have fewer rather than > more board members with such possible conflicts of interest. Heh, then should a question be whether you're a member of the FSF? Sometimes what is good for the FSF isn't good for GNOME and vice versa. Every affiliation can't be documented, it's simply to numerous to enumerate. But, work is a major one and I think it should be identified. --Ted
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part