Re: Code of conduct (bis)

[Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>]

Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>   
> > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >
> >     
> > > > I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no
> > > > official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be
> > > > interpreted like a legal document.
> > > >         
> > > s/condition/assumption/ ?
> > >       
> > No. It's a condition that I put next to my signature. Not an assumption.
> >
> > If the condition is false, my signature is invalid. If that isn't
> > possible, then I'll unsign now (just let me know).
> >     
>
> Well, it is not endorsed at the moment.
>   

It has 82 signatures. Last year 169 members could be bothered to vote 
for the board. It sounds like we've pretty much got community adoption 
now, or will in a couple of days ;-)

Additionally, the mailing list consensus is that no top-down adoption is 
necessary, and the board consensus is that there is not going to be any 
top-down forced adoption anyway.

So let's link to it from www.gnome.org, and we're finished with this. Am 
I right?

--
Andrew