Re: Petition for referendum
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Dave Neary <dneary free fr>
- Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>, Foundation-List <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Petition for referendum
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:24:29 -0400
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:02:23PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> I agree it's taking far too much energy - part of that is that we're
> working *around* the board, not with it. I'm not saying it's a panacea,
working *around* the board: with all due respect What The Fuck are you
talking about. How did the Board block you from getting anywhere ? The
board stalled on some issues because some items where dropped by lack
of time or something, it was NEVER that the board refused to do something
by being lazy, there is 2 items the board refused to follow you in
blindly. Not following blindly the opinion of excited young people is not
always just being stupid or stalled, especially when those radical changes
are potentially extremely risky. So I think I am rightly pissed off at your
two last posts at this point, public mischaracterization based on one's
biased viewpoint of a situation is not proper in my opinion.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]