Re: GNOME Foundation Elections - Official list of candidates
- From: James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
- To: Danilo Šegan <danilo gnome org>
- Cc: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Foundation Elections - Official list of candidates
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:38:58 +0800
Danilo Šegan wrote:
Or am I somehow misunderstanding "Ranked Ballot", and this would
somehow have particular effect on a case of 6 candidates out of which
only four can be chosen, compared to anybody else (and this assumed
relation is not the same as with current voting system, since Alan
somehow pointed out that they would gain something in particular)?
With the current voting system, at least 2 of the Novell candidates will
not be elected. Any votes for the least popular 2 Novell candidates
will have no effect on the result (the candidates would get knocked out
and nothing would happen to their votes).
If you had a good idea about which Novell candidates were least popular,
you'd be better off voting for someone else even if you preferred those
candidates. This is an example of the vote counting system encouraging
people to vote differently to their real preferences (ie. tactical voting).
Most vote counting schemes that use ranked ballots can handle this sort
of candidate elimination easier. Since the ballot ranks all candidates,
they still reflect the voter's intentions if you remove a candidate
during counting.
James.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]