Re: GNOME Foundation Elections - Official list of candidates
- From: Robert Love <rml novell com>
- To: Danilo Šegan <danilo gnome org>
- Cc: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Foundation Elections - Official list of candidates
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:11:59 -0500
On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 21:34 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> I think nothing stops anyone from voting for all six of Novell
> employees (there's no rule against it, AFAIK). They cannot all be
> elected, but I don't see how this system of voting is worse for them
> (not taking the "4-rule" into account) than any other system (which
> would be used along with the "4-rule"). If they're all "popular"
> candidates, they'll end up in a battle between themselves, using any
> of the systems. If some of them are not "popular", they won't be
> elected no matter what :-)
Right, people can vote for any number of people with a shared
affiliation and someone might indeed want to vote for all six Novell
employees, but in this voting system that can result in scenarios where
I decrease the chances of the "more likely" four winning.
I am not arguing for or against changing to a Ranked Ballot system, just
trying to explain what Alan is saying.
Robert Love
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]