Re: Copyright assignment
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vincent vuntz net>, Toni Willberg <toniw iki fi>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Copyright assignment
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 08:31:16 -0400
Hello,
> > The document is a contract in which you grant permission to Novell to
> > reuse your creation (you own the copyright to it) to be distributed
> > under any terms that Novell wishes to in addition to the GPL version.
>
> Another thing I am unclear about having re-read it in detail. If the
> same code gets submitted to multiple projects for example open office
> and evolution how will it work out.
>
> Copyright assignments seem to have an evil side effect so far
> overlooked. Since Novell would own the copyright it would no longer be
> possible to contribute the same code to Open Office. Thus if Gnome
> begins to accept such things the ability to reuse code is destroyed.
The developer gets the code back to `use the Works as developers sees
fit'.
> Similarly it removes the ability to build on code by reuse, since the
> owner of the code being reused may not wish to assign the use and cannot
> viably go around assigning it to Novell, Sun and everyone else.
I do not understand your scenario.
> Since the contract says "supporting files" that appears to prohibit
> submitting a patch to Evolution which uses a third party library since
> that third party library is "supporting files" and the contributor does
> not own it.
We could not incorporate such code; See section 6(a).
I cant paste, I only have a printout at home.
Miguel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]