Re: changed charter, new elections proposal
- From: Ali Abdin <aliabdin aucegypt edu>
- To: Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>
- Cc: Phil Schwan <phil off net>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: changed charter, new elections proposal
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:09:08 -0200
* Bart Decrem (bart eazel com) wrote at 16:06 on 29/09/00:
> Good point. How do other people feel about
>
> 1- posting daily interim voting results. The advantage is that it allows
> subsequent voters to tweak their votes in order to achieve a more balanced board.
> The disadvantage is described by Phil below;
>
> 2- keeping the mailing list archives closed while the election is running. We can
> easily disable the archives and provide access to it at the end of the elections
> if people prefer that.
I actually do not think it is a good idea to show which people voted for who
(it becomes worse with voting for individuals because you are saying "I favor
person A over person B" instead of "I favor group A over group B").
I understand that this is 'needed' though to 'ensure' the results of the
election are not tampered with. In the future though, I think we should work on
a secret ballot system.
Regards,
Ali
> Phil Schwan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 08:39:12PM -0700, Bart Decrem wrote:
> > > Optional: If people like my amendment to Jon and Dan's idea, the script would
> > > spit out an election update every day during the 7 days of the election.
> > > That way you can see what the board might look like before you cast your
> > > vote. That might help us get a more balanced board.
> >
> > I feel compelled to mention that I disagree with the notion of being able
> > to see results before the end of the voting (there's a reason that early
> > reporting is illegal in some countries). I think that people should be
> > voting because they believe that people will do a good job, and not
> > because they're influenced by prior voters. I also believe that the
> > early availability of results will decrease the number of people who
> > actually bother to vote.
> >
> > Now, if the voting list is going to be totally open during the entire
> > process, then I guess my point is somewhat moot (though I still disagree
> > about making it any easier to gather those statistics).
> >
> > -Phil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]