Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- From: Bart Decrem <bart eazel com>
- To: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- Cc: Nat Friedman <nat helixcode com>,Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>, foundation-list gnome org,rms gnu org
- Subject: Re: Draft of Proposal for the GNOME Foundation.
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:08:54 -0700
Martin,
What you say makes sense.
Bart
Martin Baulig wrote:
>
> This is bad. When the local foundations are just for redirecting cash,
> then we basically don't need them at all.
>
> Also, I don't like the idea that the global foundation is the only one
> which the ability to make press releases since this'd mean that the local
> ones can't even make press releases which only cover local topics.
>
> As I already stated before, I find it very important for the local
> foundations to be sovereign in at least the following topics:
>
> * GNOME shows:
> -----------
>
> It should be sole responsibility of the local foundation to decide at
> which shows in their area the GNOME team should be represented.
>
> This is a thing which the local foundations will know best about and
> it doesn't make much sense for someone who's in the US all the time to
> decide about a GNOME show in south africa, for instance.
>
> * Dealing with local user groups and such:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> The local foundations will know best about local user groups and it
> should be possible for such local user groups to contact their local
> GNOME foundation to get an authoritative statement about GNOME in
> their area.
>
> --
> Martin Baulig
> martin@gnome.org (private)
> baulig@suse.de (work)
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]