Re: Project Hosting [Was Re: Minutes of the GNOME ...]

Martin Baulig wrote:

Russell Steinthal <steintr rsteinthal i001 law columbia edu> writes:
No argument, except that my understanding was that the "new"
gnome-hackers was designed for exactly this type of discussion.  The
only argument I can think of is that we want to separate this
discussion from technical discussion on g-h, but I don't think that's
a necessary distinction.

Well, I think a reason to keep this discussion here (on foundation-list) is
that it is not really a technical one, but a political one - and because of
this everybody should have the chance to join the discussion.

Yes. I think it is funny that CVS policy has been discussed on g-h, where most of the people who it would affect don't have the right to speak.

Even more funny is that translators explicitly aren't welcome to speak on g-h (at least Miguel doesn't want it that way) but on the same time submission interfaces for translations were, until recently, only suggested and discussed on g-h.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]