Re: Project Hosting [Was Re: Minutes of the GNOME ...]

[Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>]

Martin Baulig wrote:

> Russell Steinthal <steintr rsteinthal i001 law columbia edu> writes:
> > No argument, except that my understanding was that the "new"
> > gnome-hackers was designed for exactly this type of discussion.  The
> > only argument I can think of is that we want to separate this
> > discussion from technical discussion on g-h, but I don't think that's
> > a necessary distinction.
>
> Well, I think a reason to keep this discussion here (on foundation-list) is
> that it is not really a technical one, but a political one - and because of
> this everybody should have the chance to join the discussion.

Yes. I think it is funny that CVS policy has been discussed on g-h, 
where most of the people who it would affect don't have the right to speak.

Even more funny is that translators explicitly aren't welcome to speak 
on g-h (at least Miguel doesn't want it that way) but on the same time 
submission interfaces for translations were, until recently, only 
suggested and discussed on g-h.


Christian