Re: Project Hosting [Was Re: Minutes of the GNOME ...]
- From: Chris DiBona <chris valinux com>
- To: Dan Mueth <d-mueth uchicago edu>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, <foundation-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Project Hosting [Was Re: Minutes of the GNOME ...]
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:03:32 -0800 (PST)
Why don't I forward whatever you like to the SF lead, Pat, who can committ
, in writing if you like, to what you guys need.
Chris
--
Linux Community Evangelist, VA Linux Systems http://www.valinux.com
President, Silicon Valley Linux Users Group http://www.svlug.org
Grant Chair, Linux International. http://www.li.org
Co-editor, Open Sources http://www.dibona.com
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Dan Mueth wrote:
>
> On 3 Dec 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > So why not have two machines; current gnome.org for core projects, and
> > an alternative host that anyone writing gfoo can quickly get set up
> > on. The alternative host could just be sourceforge, or we could ask VA
> > for a special box running sourceforge software calls
> > projects.gnome.org or something, or we could plop a box running some
> > of this software at the RH colocation site. Lots of options.
>
> Who is the best person to ask VA about this? The main question is whether
> they can give us a server running SourceForge with a flexible and
> easy-to-administer ACLS on it.
>
> If this is not possible, then lets have projects use SourceForge for
> everything except CVS and then set up a second CVS server with ACLS for
> non-core applications. If VA can give us the CVS server with ACLS then
> that would be nice. Otherwise lets put it at the RH colocation site and
> look for a couple new admins from the GNOME community.
>
> Dan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]