Re: Why Shotwell?

[Ruben Vermeersch <ruben savanne be>]

I propose hacktivism instead of lobbying: let's just make F-Spot so much
better that the choice is obvious :-)

On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 13:51 -0700, Michael Lissner wrote:
> Can we go and vote against shotwell. It's OK, but f-spot is indeed much better?
> Is there a link for this?
> 
> Michael Lissner
> mlissner michaeljaylissner com
> 909-576-4123
> 
> 
> ceed wrote on 07/01/2010 05:23 AM:
> > On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:24:08 -0500, Ruben Vermeersch <ruben savanne be> wrote:
> >
> >>> I've been reading recently that Shotwell is going to be the new default
> >>> photo management tool for Ubuntu (and maybe even in Gnome).
> >> Whatever Ubuntu decides has nothing to do with GNOME.
> >
> > One blog post I read ( http://is.gd/dbgj1 ) put it that way, so I asked. Also,
> > I actually think that what Canonical decides to do on it's default desktop
> > ultimately will affect Gnome under certain circumstances.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> f-spot-list mailing list
> f-spot-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
>