Re: [evolution-patches] CamelObject with gslice

[Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>]

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 02:58 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 20:49 -0400, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 02:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> 
> > > I haven't remove the EMutex -> GMutex replacements of camel-object.c,
> > > done by Matthew, that are since today also in my own copy. Feel free to
> > > re-replace them with EMutex API yourself or else feel free to ignore
> > > this patch.
> > 
> > These two paragraphs strike me as rather antagonistic.  why are you
> > bothering to mail the patches at all?  If forking is your aim, then
> > there's no need, and if it's not your aim, then you should probably try
> > harder to work with the maintainers, no?
> 
> My personal aim is to get some work actually done. I'm planning to keep
> sending what I'm working on and is relevant for evolution in the form of
> patches to the upstream mailing list so that upstream can pick and
> decide what they want to do with it.
> 

But your patches aren't useful in the form in which you send them (debug
output, your own claims to them not being directly useful, etc).  It all
just seems rather counterproductive.

Chris