Re: [evolution-patches] CamelObject with gslice

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 20:49 -0400, Chris Toshok wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 02:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:

> > I haven't remove the EMutex -> GMutex replacements of camel-object.c,
> > done by Matthew, that are since today also in my own copy. Feel free to
> > re-replace them with EMutex API yourself or else feel free to ignore
> > this patch.
> 
> These two paragraphs strike me as rather antagonistic.  why are you
> bothering to mail the patches at all?  If forking is your aim, then
> there's no need, and if it's not your aim, then you should probably try
> harder to work with the maintainers, no?

My personal aim is to get some work actually done. I'm planning to keep
sending what I'm working on and is relevant for evolution in the form of
patches to the upstream mailing list so that upstream can pick and
decide what they want to do with it.


-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend 
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be 
http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be