Re: [evolution-patches] CamelObject with gslice

[Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>]

On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 02:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Mostly admin allocation go down drastically after replacing this with
> g_slice_alloc. I'm soon going to produce a patch that not only replaces
> all this with g_slice_alloc, but also reduces the size of the struct
> itself. I'm expecting this work to reduce memory consumption with
> another 15 to 20% (for tinymail at least).
> 
> I haven't remove the EMutex -> GMutex replacements of camel-object.c,
> done by Matthew, that are since today also in my own copy. Feel free to
> re-replace them with EMutex API yourself or else feel free to ignore
> this patch.

These two paragraphs strike me as rather antagonistic.  why are you
bothering to mail the patches at all?  If forking is your aim, then
there's no need, and if it's not your aim, then you should probably try
harder to work with the maintainers, no?

Chris