Re: [evolution-patches] Patches for mail related a11y

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

As discussed on irc - for want of any significant reason to reject it, apart from the below changes, I don't see any reason to refuse this.  Might want to wait until tomorrow though, incase any on the wrong side of the world care to comment.

Thanks,
 Michael

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 15:14 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>     
>     Ok re irc i'll have to get back to you on some of the details, a couple of minor issues though.
>     
>     --- em-format-html-display.c 28 Oct 2004 09:25:26 -0000 1.56
>     +++ em-format-html-display.c 2 Nov 2004 06:49:08 -0000
>     @@ -1296,6 +1296,11 @@ efhd_attachment_button(EMFormatHTML *efh
>     button = gtk_button_new();
>     /*GTK_WIDGET_UNSET_FLAGS(button, GTK_CAN_FOCUS);*/
>     gtk_container_add((GtkContainer *)button, gtk_arrow_new(GTK_ARROW_DOWN, GTK_SHADOW_NONE));
>     +
>     + AtkObject *a11y = gtk_widget_get_accessible (button);
>     + atk_object_set_name (a11y, _("Attachment Button"));
>     +
>     +
>     g
>     
>     don't declare the variable 'inline', it must be in the declaration section (before any statements), and don't add 2 blank lines, only add one.
>     
>     and p_4.diff, the camel changes - these are not really strictly gtk strings.  but i suppose thats all they'll be used for.

--

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> "I'm stuck in a reality I can't imagine could be real." Novell's Evolution and Free Software Developer