Re: [evolution-patches] proposed fix for bug #40788



this was commited yesterday or last week.

On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:26, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> new updated patch which treats garbage returns as -ERR
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:18, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 21:21, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > 1. we need to make sure the pop server will be ok to use after the
> > > > broken response.
> > > 
> > > This is next to impossible now.  About all we can conclude is that if we
> > > still have an open socket, the server must be ok with that.  Of course,
> > > the protocol could get wildly out of sync, but i dont think there's much
> > > else we can do (if the server can't even delineate responses with the
> > > right number of eol's, then its too seriously fubar'd anyway).
> > 
> > I assume in that case it will just result in a user-reported error?  As
> > long as it doesn't mess up the app in unexpected ways that should be
> > fine.
> > 
> > -- Ettore
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-patches mailing list
> > Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]