Re: [evolution-patches] proposed fix for bug #40788
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
- Cc: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] proposed fix for bug #40788
- Date: 17 Jun 2003 16:09:16 -0400
this was commited yesterday or last week.
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:26, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> new updated patch which treats garbage returns as -ERR
>
> Jeff
>
> On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:18, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 21:21, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > 1. we need to make sure the pop server will be ok to use after the
> > > > broken response.
> > >
> > > This is next to impossible now. About all we can conclude is that if we
> > > still have an open socket, the server must be ok with that. Of course,
> > > the protocol could get wildly out of sync, but i dont think there's much
> > > else we can do (if the server can't even delineate responses with the
> > > right number of eol's, then its too seriously fubar'd anyway).
> >
> > I assume in that case it will just result in a user-reported error? As
> > long as it doesn't mess up the app in unexpected ways that should be
> > fine.
> >
> > -- Ettore
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-patches mailing list
> > Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]