Re: [evolution-patches] patch for fixing 41569, 41567, and partial fix for 41038



On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 11:54, Anna Marie Dirks wrote:
> Sooo. 
> 
> I'd like to submit for your consideration a re-worked version of this
> patch which: 
> 
> a) breaks fewer strings
> 
> b) uses the "hig-approved" notion of the difference between add/remove
> and new/delete. (the main point being that you ought to use "delete"
> with items where after it is gone, it cannot be recovered; and
> similarly, you ought to use "remove" with items which can be restored.
> Considered in this way, we delete folders, but we remove shortcut
> groups. since the partner of "Delete" is supposed to be "New", and the
> partner of "Remove" is supposed to be "Add", I changed the "new
> shortcut" item to "add shortcut".) 
> 
> c) the order of menuitems in the folder and shortcuts context menus was
> oddly different (..<sep>/Delete/Rename/New<sep>... vs.
> <sep>New/Delete/Remove</sep>..) , so I straightened that out too. 

Looks good.

-- Ettore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]