Re: [evolution-patches] patch for fixing 41569, 41567, and partial fix for 41038



Committed


On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 11:20, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 11:54, Anna Marie Dirks wrote:
> > Sooo. 
> > 
> > I'd like to submit for your consideration a re-worked version of this
> > patch which: 
> > 
> > a) breaks fewer strings
> > 
> > b) uses the "hig-approved" notion of the difference between add/remove
> > and new/delete. (the main point being that you ought to use "delete"
> > with items where after it is gone, it cannot be recovered; and
> > similarly, you ought to use "remove" with items which can be restored.
> > Considered in this way, we delete folders, but we remove shortcut
> > groups. since the partner of "Delete" is supposed to be "New", and the
> > partner of "Remove" is supposed to be "Add", I changed the "new
> > shortcut" item to "add shortcut".) 
> > 
> > c) the order of menuitems in the folder and shortcuts context menus was
> > oddly different (..<sep>/Delete/Rename/New<sep>... vs.
> > <sep>New/Delete/Remove</sep>..) , so I straightened that out too. 
> 
> Looks good.
> 
> -- Ettore
-- 
Anna Marie Dirks <anna ximian com>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]