Re: [evolution-patches] patch for fixing 41569, 41567, and partial fix for 41038
- From: Anna Marie Dirks <anna ximian com>
- To: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] patch for fixing 41569, 41567, and partial fix for 41038
- Date: 23 Apr 2003 15:19:22 -0400
Committed
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 11:20, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 11:54, Anna Marie Dirks wrote:
> > Sooo.
> >
> > I'd like to submit for your consideration a re-worked version of this
> > patch which:
> >
> > a) breaks fewer strings
> >
> > b) uses the "hig-approved" notion of the difference between add/remove
> > and new/delete. (the main point being that you ought to use "delete"
> > with items where after it is gone, it cannot be recovered; and
> > similarly, you ought to use "remove" with items which can be restored.
> > Considered in this way, we delete folders, but we remove shortcut
> > groups. since the partner of "Delete" is supposed to be "New", and the
> > partner of "Remove" is supposed to be "Add", I changed the "new
> > shortcut" item to "add shortcut".)
> >
> > c) the order of menuitems in the folder and shortcuts context menus was
> > oddly different (..<sep>/Delete/Rename/New<sep>... vs.
> > <sep>New/Delete/Remove</sep>..) , so I straightened that out too.
>
> Looks good.
>
> -- Ettore
--
Anna Marie Dirks <anna ximian com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]