Re: [Evolution] Evolution Mail stopped working

[Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim Tjernlund infinera com>]

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 10:20 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 14:10 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:44 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > My problem may have been the default Host URL( 
> > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexchange.infinera.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjoakim.tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C89be73772d8d4d5d192a08d8c395a09b%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637474394710733791%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=T3HYwlIZAt%2BXlrJpoEvneV58aWQim7grLksMW%2FtiSdw%3D&reserved=0...
> > >  )
> > > Is there some config/#define I can change so Host URL defaults to
> > >  
> > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Foutlook.office365.com%2FEWS%2FExchange.asmx&data=04%7C01%7Cjoakim.tjernlund%40infinera.com%7C89be73772d8d4d5d192a08d8c395a09b%7C285643de5f5b4b03a1530ae2dc8aaf77%7C1%7C0%7C637474394710733791%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=5QqXbn7IhQrjJ0BqQXLzYXrN9GJfpCZTuIg7t3uFFkE%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >     Hi,
> > the "default" Host URL is only a suggestion, it's (I'd say 'always',
> > but let's use 'almost always') changed by the user. The important part
> > is that it gives an idea what it should look like. The Host URL used to
> > be empty, which made the users (including me) just lost.
>
> Sure, but for my users it would be easier if there were one less thing to remember.
> Often such stuff require some IT support.
>
> > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:50 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > Nope, that was not it, Basic auth just fails/asks for passwd over and
> > > over again
> > >
> > > OAuth2 get me this error at Fetch URL:
> > > Autodiscovery query failed.
> > > The reported error was “8 Data source “xxxxxx” does not support OAuth
> > > 2.0 authentication”.
> >
> > Right, I tried it here and I see that too. Using the Basic auth is not
> > the way to go.
>
> Is this something you can fix? Using Evo onwards will be hard otherwise.

I create an Issue at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/1358