Re: [Evolution] Reply Header Order?

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 15:23 -0600, Paul Stejskal wrote:
> On 1月 19 2018, at 5:00 凌晨, Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve> wrote: 
> > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 07:45 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: 
> > > P.S.: by the way, Ctrl+L replies to the list, even some people here 
> > > prefer Reply to All. Reply to list works better for me. HTML on this 
> > > list is sort of bad, the same as the "outlook style" reply (it's harder 
> > > to read when not using top posting, which is also kind of bad on this 
> > > list), but I can understand that you are used to it from your work 
> > > environment, which makes perfect sense. 
> >  
> > Just to reiterate: list members are encouraged to use Reply to List 
> > when possible, but unfortunately when someone on a thread uses Reply To 
> > All then all subsequent replies on that subthread are forced to use it 
> > too. 
> >
> > Regarding top-posting: what is common practice in corporate or private 
> > emails is not the preferred style on mailing lists. The culture is 
> > different and the *strong* preference, especially for those who use 
> > mailing lists a lot, is to employ the in-line style of selectively 
> > quoting the parts we want to comment on, with the relevant comment 
> > following the quote. This is much easier to read, particularly in long 
> > nested comments. The top-posting style also wastefully copies the 
> > entire context of the message over and over again to no purpose 
> > (everything is available on the list archive anyway). 
> >
> > Cheers 
> >
> > poc 
>
> Alright noted. I will correct my habits.

Cheers

poc