Re: [Evolution] Bug 738247 - unwanted information disclosure in message headers


On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:59 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
I personally wouldn't be excessively worried either way (which is why
I don't really want to comment on the bug) but would err on the side 
of leaving things as they are - it just looks less spammy.

Is 'err' a typo? I'm afraid I do not follow, if not.

(spamassassin tests for lots of issues with the HELO string - one of
them is for a "bare IP" address, another for "numeric HELO".)

This is exactly the type of the information I'm looking for. I do not
know all the consequences which the change would cause.
        Thanks and bye,

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]