Re: [Evolution] Colord/ioctl

[Stig Roar Wangberg <srw openmailbox org>]

ma., 28.03.2016 kl. 23.47 +0100, skrev Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 20:52 +0200, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > I get a message in Evolution that signing fails due to some ioctl,
> > and
> > SELinux is giving me a message about some colord attempt to accsess
> > read on this file: /etc/udev/hwdb.bin. Are these to connected
> > somehow? 
> >
> > I'm running Evolution on both Trisquel and Mint with no problems.
> > Now
> > I'm in Fedora, and also want to use Evolution there too. But
> > signing
> > and encryption fails due to some issues with the ioctl. About the
> > other
> > message, from SELinux, I really don't know what is. I was thinking
> > that
> > Evolution needs access to my gpg keys, and that Fedora (SELinux)
> > somehow denies it? 
> >
> > What can I do about this, please.
> I give up. What does "some ioctl" mean? What is the actual message?
> We're aren't telepathic. And once again, remember to quote your
> version
> of Evolution.
>
> I doubt the SElinux issue is related to Evolution, but once again we
> aren't able to guess what it is if you don't tell us. There are tools
> to analyze SElinux messages and tell you what's causing them. Perhaps
> you should read up on them.
>
> poc

Evolution 3.18.5.2

Because "gpg: no running gpg-agent - starting '/usr/bin/gpg-agent'
gpg: waiting for the agent to come up ... (5s)
gpg: connection to agent established
gpg: writing to '-'
gpg: signering mislyktes: Uegnet «ioctl» for enhet
gpg: signing failed: Uegnet «ioctl» for enhet
", you may need to select different mail options.

The Norwegian parts says "signing failed: Improper ioctl for unit"

Stig