Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10
- From: Brewster Gillett <bg fdi us>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] evolution-list Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 07:51:54 -0700
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:27 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
<snip>
However as I've said before, the justification for using Digest mode on
lists has virtually disappeared. If at all possible people should avoid
it. It belongs to the days of slow dial-up modems. I'm not saying we
should eliminate it as there may be people who really do need it, but
they are at most a very small minority.
poc
bg:
Thank you for that concise and penetrating observation, Patrick. I've saved it to my file
of sig-quotes :-)
For those who might not be fully aware, Digest encourages three of the most obnoxious
amongst clueless e-list behaviours; top-posting, failure to edit backquote, and failure
to edit subject line to match the backquote's subject. Digest mode should have been strangled
in its crib. I have asked many Digest users to supply a justification for their use, and when
presented with the obvious counterarguments which *any* of those justifications are heir to, they
have no response beyond gaping like a gaffed grouper :-)
Brewster
--
***********************************************************************
"We have not given estimates for the time of preparation,
as some people take half an hour to slice three pounds of mushrooms
while others take five minutes."
FROM THE INTRODUCTION
_Mastering the Art of French Cooking_ by Julia Child et al
***********************************************************************
W. Brewster Gillett bg fdi us Portland, OR USA
***********************************************************************
Simply because you don't like to hear it, that doesn't make it untrue.
***********************************************************************
|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]