Re: [Evolution] Evolution performance

[Reid Vail <rsv869 roadrunner com>]

I've found it to be very stable, just slow and am trying to understand why.

Reid

On Mon, 26 May 2014 16:58:51 +0200
Ralf Mardorf <ralf mardorf rocketmail com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 10:28 -0400, Reid Vail wrote:
> > I have a performance question:
> >
> > My wife is running ubuntu 13.04 with Evolution 3.6.4 and it seems to
> > me that it takes a long time to load; about 30 seconds from start to
> > load
> >
> > She does have quite a lot of data.  Using the Evolution backup tool
> > the compressed file is about 1gig.  Her machine is not stellar but
> > should be sufficient.  She has a standard 7200-rpm drive and a AMD
> > Athlon II X3 processor.  When I watch on the system monitor the CPU
> > isn't working that hard, memory is fine, but the HD light is on solid
> > until software and data load.
> >
> > Does this seem right?
>
> No! :S
>
> I prefer using Arch Linux and a wild mix of Debian stable, testing and
> unstable.
>
> I have got several *buntu installs on my machine, because I welcome the
> effort the Ubuntu Studio developers do, even while I disagree very often
> with their choices. However, I experienced Evolution for several *buntu
> installs as unusable.
>
> Regards,
> Ralf
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list gnome org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list


-- 
Reid Vail <rsv869 roadrunner com>