On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:08 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:Patrick, I agree that different behaviours could be wanted, but there
> I would say that it's a matter of opinion whether this is correct
> behaviour or not. I don't know of a precise specification of what the
> timeout semantics are supposed to be (other than the code) so you might
> need to propose it as a change in BZ.
anyway is a "feature" I would call a bug. If an unread mail is marked
while emptying the trash, this mail will be marked as read after trash
is emptied.