Re: [Evolution] filter processing stops after 1st filter executes

[Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>]

On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 16:11 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> The second filter would be executed on the original message, not on the
> new copy of the original message in the "processed" folder - that's
> probably the part here.

I would clarify that first part:

"The second filter would be executed on the original message which is
now marked for deletion by the first filter..."

Probably giving the appearance that the second filter isn't working
since it's acting on a deleted message.

Matthew Barnes