Re: [Evolution] Filtering

[Richard <richard bown blueyonder co uk>]

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 07:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 11:10 +0000, Richard wrote: 
> > Thanks Andre
> > Pete has answered my question. I've altered the sig block to include Evo
> > version and OS, to aid future questions to the list
>
> Adding the Evo version to your sig is redundant, given that the info is
> already in your mail headers if anyone wants to look. And if you use
> this version to ask a question about a different version (say a later
> one which isn't working for you), it's still not useful. Plus many
> people don't even read sigs (I usually can't be bothered).
>
> What I'm saying is that if in future you ask an Evo question on the
> list, it would still be a good idea to mention the version in the body
> of the message.
>
> Cheers
>
> poc
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list gnome org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

OK poc all noted, I'll play around with the block again
-- 
Best wishes / 73
Richard Bown
nil carborundum a illegitemis
########################################################################
Sent by Evolution 2.32.1 on Fedora FC14 x86_64 Dual core AMD Athlon 4400
Ham Call:G8JVM 
Maidenhead QRA: IO82SP38:LAT. 52 39.720':N LONG. 2 28.171 W (degs,mins )
QRV HF + VHF Microwave 23 cms:140W,13 cms:100W,6 cms:10W & 3 cms:5W
########################################################################