Re: [Evolution] Mail filter question

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:53 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 07:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 07:14 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > > What happens if "a or b, delete" is issued before the other two? Is
> > > some
> > > > priority order available?
> > >
> > > Yes, but mail filter rules [AFAIK] are always processed sequentially;
> > > taking advantage of the sequence is common practice.
> >
> > Correct. If the rules weren't processed sequentially it wouldn't make
> > sense to have a STOP rule.
>
> In what order are the filters applied, from top to bottom?

Yes.

> When I did
> that all my mails sent to two mailing lists were removed...
>
> S and a, copy to folder
> S and b, copy to folder
> a or b, delete

I haven't look at your specific set of filters so I can't comment.

poc